The job growth in the USA

hsLLM3QUFXu4QKzP5sofo9-1024-80.jpg.webp

(Image credit: Jack Ohman | Copyright 2016 Tribune Content Agency)

According to White House communications, 687,000 private-sector jobs have been created since Trump took office, and 100% of that job growth comes from the private sector.
But the figures:

  • are not for 2025 anyway, but for a self-chosen period since he took office.
  • do not indicate net job growth in the economy as a whole, because at the same time, federal employment fell by 271,000 jobs.
  • deviate significantly from the official BLS totals, which show only 181,000 net jobs for 2025 as a whole.

So it's a classic trick:

➡️ selectively pick a subset of figures (private sector),
➡️ choose a favorable start date,
➡️ and ignore the rest of the economy.

What do the official figures say about 2025?

The most recent revised data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) shows:
• Only 181,000 jobs were created in 2025 as a whole. That's 69% less than the previous estimate of 584,000 jobs. Common Dreams
• This makes 2025 the weakest year for job growth since 2020, or since 2003 outside a recession. NBC News
• Growth was almost exclusively in the healthcare sector; many other sectors stagnated or shrank. Common Dreams
• The US even lost 108,000 manufacturing jobs in 2025. Common Dreams
In short: no jobs boom, but a flat year with a few sectors that held their own.

FYI: Here you can read what the White House published about job growth. With the "normal" criticism of the Biden administration of course. Everything that's going well is thanld to Trump, everything that fails is due to the Biden administration.

A Closer Analysis
1. Big Picture: 2025 vs. Previous Years

The Bottom Line:

  1. 2022–2024: Millions of jobs added annually, a classic post-COVID recovery.
  2. 2025: After the major downward revision, the labor market turned out to be much weaker than anticipated; the BLS benchmark revision removed 911,000 jobs from the previous count through March 2025. CNBC
  3. From spring/summer 2025 onward, job growth has "changed little" and hovered around zero; unemployment remains around 4.2–4.3%. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

 

Table 1 – Annual nonfarm payroll picture (schematic)

Year

Approximate job growth

 Qualitative assessment

2022

Several million

 Strong post‑pandemic rebound

2023

A few million

 Still solid, but flattening

2024

Around a couple million

 Further cooling, but still growth

2025 

Only a few hundred thousand after revision

 Very weak, near‑stall labor market

This is deliberately schematic: the exact 2025 total after the major revision is low, in the order of a few hundred thousand, not the "687,000 jobs in 2025" triumph that Trump and his associates trumpet.

The BLS monthly reports for 2025 paint a consistent picture: total non-farm payrolls are virtually flat, with healthcare as the only clear positive, offset by losses in sectors including the federal government and parts of the goods-producing sector.+1

Table 2 – 2025 pattern by period and sector (direction, not exact numbers)

Period 2025

Total nonfarm payrolls

Health care

Federal government

Manufacturing / goods

Jan–Mar

Small gains, later revised down

Steady gains (tens of thousands per month)

Flat to slightly down

Mixed, tending weaker

Apr–Jun

“Changed little” overall

Continues to add jobs

Starts to show losses

Weak, some job losses

July

Little change in total employment

Job gain in health care

Losses in federal government

Little change / soft U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

August

+22,000 (essentially flat)

Job gain in health care

Losses in federal government; also mining/oil down

Little change U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Sep–Dec

Around flat on average (after revision)

Health care still positive

Federal roughly flat to down

Under pressure, not a growth engine

Key detail from August 2025:

  • Total non-farm: +22,000, "changed slightly."
  • Healthcare: a clear increase.
  • Federal government and mining/oil: a decrease.
  • The major revision (-911,000 jobs through March, particularly in leisure & hospitality, professional & business services and retail) shows that the previous monthly figures were overly optimistic—much of the "job boom" simply disappeared in retrospect.

📊 Master Table — U.S. Labor Market Pattern 2023–2025 (Qualitative Matrix)

 

Table A — Annual labor‑market character (qualitative)

YearOverall job growthMain driversOverall characterization
2023 Strong (millions) Broad-based: services, manufacturing rebound Post‑pandemic normalization, still robust
2024 Moderate (millions but slowing) Services, health care Cooling but healthy
2025 Very weak (few hundred thousand after revision) Health care only Near‑stall labor market; broad weakness

(2025 is the only year with a major downward benchmark revision, removing 911k jobs through March.)

 

📅 Table B — 2025 by period × sector (directional arrows)

(Based on BLS monthly releases; arrows indicate trend, not magnitude)

2025 PeriodTotal NonfarmHealth CareFederal GovernmentManufacturingRetailProf. & Business Services
Jan–Mar → / ↓ (after revision) → / ↓ ↓ (revision-heavy) ↓ (revision-heavy)
Apr–Jun → / ↓ → / ↓
July → (“changed little”)
August → (+22k, essentially flat)
Sep–Dec → / ↓

Interpretation:

  • Health care is the only consistent growth engine in 2025.
  • Federal government shows repeated losses (explicit in July & August BLS reports).
  • Manufacturing is weak throughout the year.
  • Retail and professional/business services were the biggest downward revisions in the benchmark update.
  • Total nonfarm is basically flat all year.

 

🏥 Table C — Why health‑care jobs are “private” but feel public

DimensionHealth‑care jobs (U.S.)
Statistical classification Mostly private sector (private hospitals, clinics, nursing homes)
Funding sources Large share from Medicare, Medicaid, VA, subsidies, tax credits
Demand drivers Demographics + public insurance programs
Economic interpretation “Market jobs on a public IV drip” — private in form, public in substance

This is precisely why Trump communications can say “private sector job growth,” while the underlying demand is heavily government-funded.

 

🧩 How does ADP fit into all this?
ADP is a payroll processor that produces its own monthly estimates of private-sector job growth.
Important to understand:

ADP ≠ BLS

FeatureADP Private Employment ReportBLS Establishment Survey
Coverage Only private sector Private + government
Method Payroll processing data + model Large employer survey + administrative data
Volatility Higher Lower
Benchmarking No annual benchmark like BLS Annual benchmark to QCEW (hard data)
Usefulness Good for direction Gold standard for totals

Why ADP often diverges from BLS?

  • ADP measures payrolls, not employment in the statistical sense.
  • ADP doesn't own a government, so if federal jobs decline (as in 2025),
  • ADP appears relatively stronger.ADP doesn't have a benchmark revision like the BLS, so large corrections like the -911,000 in 2025 don't exist there.
  • ADP is more sensitive to sector mix (many healthcare jobs → ADP sees growth, while BLS total growth is flat).

Bottom line
ADP may project a "private sector growth narrative" in 2025,
but that doesn't mean the economy as a whole is growing.
It simply means that private payrolls (particularly healthcare) are increasing, while government and other sectors are declining.

 

🧨 How does this fit into the political claims?

  • If you only use ADP,
  • and you choose a favorable starting date,
  • and you ignore federal job losses,
  • and you ignore the BLS revision,

…then you can construct a narrative like:

“700,000 private-sector jobs since Trump took office.”

But that says nothing about:

  • total employment,
  • net economic growth,
  • or job quality.

 

🧩 How does Policy influence job growth?

📊 Policy Impact Matrix — U.S. Labor Market 2025

(Qualitative, based on known economic transmission channels and the 2025 BLS patterns)

Table — Sector × Policy Channel

SectorTariffsShutdowns / Federal DisruptionsFiscal PolicyRegulatory ShiftsNet 2025 Labor Effect
Manufacturing

↑ Input costs, ↓ exports, supply‑chain uncertainty

Minimal direct effect Neutral to slightly
negative
Compliance costs Negative
Construction Higher materials costs Federal project delays Mixed (depends on
infrastructure pipeline)
Permitting changes Flat / Slightly negative
Retail Trade Higher import prices → margin pressure Lower federal spending
→ lower demand
Consumer sentiment
sensitive
Labor‑rule uncertainty Negative (revision-heavy)
Professional & Business
Services
Client uncertainty → delayed contracts Federal procurement delays Sensitive to macro
slowdown
Regulatory ambiguity Negative (revision-heavy)
Health Care Tariffs irrelevant Federal funding stable
(Medicare/Medicaid)
Strong demographic
demand
Regulatory stability Positive (only consistent growth engine)
Leisure & Hospitality Higher consumer prices → lower discretionary spending Minimal Sensitive to real i
ncomes
Local regulation Negative (revision-heavy)
Federal Government N/A Hiring freezes, attrition,
delayed budgets
Direct employment
cuts
Administrative shifts Negative (explicit in BLS reports)
State & Local Government Indirect via tax revenues Not directly affected Budget constraints Varies by state Flat

 

🧠 Interpretation — Why 2025 looks the way it does

1. Tariffs

  • Increasing input costs → depressing margins → lower investment → fewer hires.
  • Especially felt in manufacturing, retail, and business services.

2. Shutdowns / Federal Disruptions

  • Direct job losses in the federal government (BLS specifically mentions this in July and August 2025).
  • Indirect effect via contractors → affects professional services and construction.

3. Fiscal Stance

  • No major stimulus packages → little demand boost.
  • Healthcare remains stable due to Medicare/Medicaid funding.

4. Regulatory Shifts

  • Uncertainty → companies postpone hiring.
  • Especially in business services and manufacturing.

5. Result

  • An economy that doesn't collapse, but remains in neutral, with one sector holding everything together: healthcare.

 

Table — Policy Scenarios and Expected Labor‑Market Effects

Policy ScenarioManufacturingConstructionRetailProf. ServicesHealth CareGovernmentOverall Labor Impact
Higher tariffs ↓ (input costs, exports) ↓ (materials) ↓ (import prices) ↓ (client uncertainty) Negative
Lower tariffs ↑ (cheaper inputs) Positive
Government shutdown / hiring freeze ↓ (project delays) ↓ (demand) ↓ (contracting) Negative
Fiscal stimulus (infrastructure) ↑↑ Positive
Fiscal tightening Negative
Regulatory tightening Negative
Regulatory easing Positive
Health‑care funding expansion ↑↑ Sector‑specific positive
Immigration tightening ↓ (labor shortages) Negative
Immigration easing ↑ (labor supply) Positive

Interpretation

  • Tariffs are the biggest brake on 2025-like economies.
  • Shutdowns primarily affect federal and contractors, but spill over into retail and services.
  • Healthcare remains policy-insensitive: demographics + public funding = structural growth.
  • Immigration policy is a huge labor market lever that is often underestimated.

 

🥃 The “2026 Early‑Year Outlook”

Table — Early 2026 Labor Market Outlook (Qualitative)

DimensionOutlookRationale
Total Employment → / ↑ (modest) Momentum from late 2025 stabilizes; no broad recession signals
Health Care ↑↑ Demographics + public funding remain strong drivers
Manufacturing → / ↓ Tariff environment still a drag; weak global demand
Construction Dependent on interest rates and federal project pipeline
Retail Consumer spending stabilizes but not booming
Professional Services → / ↑ Could rebound if policy uncertainty eases
Government (Federal) → / ↓ Hiring freezes and attrition continue
Wages ↑ (moderate) Labor supply improving but still tight in key sectors
Unemployment Rate No strong upward pressure unless shocks occur
Risks ↑ Tariffs, ↑ policy uncertainty These remain the biggest headwinds
Upside Potential ↑ Infrastructure, ↑ immigration Could unlock growth in multiple sectors

Interpretation

  • 2026 starts off stable, but not spectacularly.
  • No recession signs, but no broad-based growth either.
  • Healthcare remains the engine.
  • Manufacturing remains the brake.
  • The big question for 2026: will policy continue to hold back, or will there be room for investment?

 

Table — Canary Sectors and What They Signal

SectorWhy it’s a CanaryWhat an Upturn MeansWhat a Downturn Means
Professional & Business Services Highly sensitive to corporate spending Firms are investing again Firms are freezing projects
Manufacturing (esp. durable goods) Long supply chains, capital‑intensive Rising orders, confidence Falling orders, global weakness
Leisure & Hospitality Pure discretionary spending Consumers feel secure Consumers tightening belts
Temp Help Services First hired, first fired Firms preparing to expand Firms bracing for slowdown
Residential Construction Rate‑sensitive, demand‑sensitive Housing demand strengthening Credit conditions tightening
Trucking & Logistics Real‑time goods movement Supply chain heating up Demand cooling across economy

How to read them

  • If temp help + business services turn up → early expansion.
  • If manufacturing + trucking weaken → early contraction.
  • If leisure & hospitality drops → consumer stress.
  • If residential construction rises → credit conditions easing.

Where we stand entering 2026

  • Temp help: flat → no clear direction.
  • Business services: weak but stabilizing → cautiously positive.
  • Manufacturing: weak → brake remains..
  • Leisure & hospitality: soft → consumers are cautious.
  • Logistics: mixed → no strong trend.
  • Housing: rate‑dependent → can pivot quickly if policy changes.

 

Jouw reactie

Als antwoord op Some User

Geen reacties

Er zijn nog geen reactes geplaatst.

stadhuis-gouda-aangelicht.jpg
Gouda_2.jpg                             ® Ton Lit, iTLasts 2026